Incident response

Prepare an incident response for stale address claims

A stale address claim should be corrected quickly without erasing the evidence needed to explain what changed.

Editorial scope: This independent guide explains verification methods and does not publish or route readers to a claimed Mars Market URL, mirror, onion or transaction destination.

A stale address claim should be corrected quickly without erasing the evidence needed to explain what changed.

Define the incident trigger

Examples include an unexpected redirect, ownership transition, source retraction or contradictory canonical.

A documented trigger prevents routine downtime from being treated as the same event.

Reduce exposure immediately

Remove actionable navigation and change the public record to pending while preserving a neutral explanation.

Do not replace the destination until the new claim has completed the full review.

Review principle: Treat every Mars Market address claim as time-bound evidence. Do not publish or follow a destination until its source, role and current context are independently documented.

Preserve a minimal evidence log

Record the previous status, observation time, changed signal and person or process that reviewed it.

Avoid storing credentials, personal data or unnecessary page copies.

Coordinate technical corrections

Update canonicals, sitemaps, internal links, structured data and search submissions when the public URL record changes.

Mixed signals can keep stale content discoverable after the visible page is corrected.

Close with a post-incident review

Document the root evidence gap, response timing and monitoring improvements.

The goal is to strengthen the process rather than make unsupported claims about intent.